Mysteries
of
the
Cosmos
Rhett Ritter
Author
Infinity represents a concept so unfathomable it’s the only logical starting point. I have to risk going in regressive loops to try to paint this picture as clearly as possible but I would describe myself as a linguistic artist so buckle up.
Infinity at its very heart is the eternal nature of time. Time is eternally passing us by every second of every day. Tomorrow represents an infinite horizon with a keen edge meant to divide yesterday from today.
In terms of numbers and letters it’s easy to explain what infinity means.
Start counting words.
But the infinite nature of numbers and letters is very misleading in the age of ai. Every word of every sentence gets digested by a computer and spit back out as a dissection of the totality of letters and numbers.
Both numbers and letters are simply digits humanity is subject to using to communicate everything from thoughts and feelings to the temperature outside. But numbers and letters are far more limiting than the understanding that they can communicate.
To become enlightened is to recognize mathematics as the language humanity has developed not only to discern reality but to communicate with one another everything we could ever possibly discover about the universe.
Mathematics has been developed over thousands of years by humans and has been translated accurately since the dawn of time. But the purpose of mathematics is to identify precise expressions of the natural world.
Most people assume numbers are infinite when in fact there are only 10 real numbers. The ten numbers that exist are 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. This is not a reference to 1⇔10 but rather ♾️
Letters give us a few more opportunities to recognize the current picture being painted but to understand it requires linguistic ambiguity.
Letters are really only symbols that when added together make up words intended to have a specific purpose. If we put a few words together it creates a sentence meant to be understood by the surrounding context whether spoken or written. And by extension of that numbers are also symbols meant to be used to communicate an idea in terms of mathematics.
Infinity as a word has been a topic of debate longer than time itself. But as a number infinity could be considered time itself. Time is organically a subjective property of the natural world. In modern science time is described as an emergent property only known to be somewhere in the tree of knowledge of which it is precisely the square root of physics. You see what I did there.
Combining a few words to create a lighthearted comedic effect within this text will be a recurring theme. It’s actually going to comprise pieces of the explanations this manuscript intends to communicate several times.
Mathematics can be described in a linguistic manner consistent with the ideology inherent to a mathematical interpretation of language. By applying conceptually the ideas meant to be understood within this document linguistic mathematics can determine the linguistically mathematical interpretation of every word of my thoughts and theories.
Thoughts can be expressed in so many different ways it once seemed as if there were an infinite number of words that would never end up equating to a single thing besides wasted time. But by applying mathematics to writing and speaking about the inherent concepts within the ideas can be used to reconcile the equations of string theory with gravity to explain the 100% accuracy of quantum mechanics.
At this point I must admit in order to do the calculations required to “prove” string theory will require anyone who is able to follow the math to actually do so. Someone that introduces a mathematically consistent set of rules to apply the differences between numeric value and linguistic connotation. Like a single manuscript that could be considered a linguistic guide to not only discerning what is necessary to apply the concepts defined hereafter but serve as a benchmark for future generations to define precise values based on the arrow of time. Like a guide to temporal wave conjugation duality distribution function. Then we could finally identify the graviton as a quanta of gravitational waves of the gravioelectromagnetic field.
It is with the uttermost pride and humble sincerity that I submit this document as a living testament and recollection of history in the making during our generation.
Generations of the past built the foundational knowledge necessary to develop a photograph from these words. It is their contributions that deserve the utmost respect.
Blood, sweat, and tears shed by the men and women who came before us are the only reason our species hasn’t gone extinct. Even our ancestors that were cave dwellers play a part in understanding how to draw a line from the big bang to the edges of the observable universe and anywhere in between.
Humanity has deemed itself an intelligent species based on being at the top of the food chain viewing life from a lens that covers even our own eyes. But humanity created not only words and mathematics but the telegraph and the telephone and even put a man on the moon. In order to do these things a consistent language is required and that language is mathematics.
Mathematics is considered the back bone of academia as all sciences and subsequent subjects have a shared foundation built on the backs of eternal mathematicians. This doesn’t mean a particular person made more or less contributions than another throughout history. Rather it means that mathematics is such an imperative concept to apply in this instance that every person throughout history who made a significant contribution could be defined as a mathematician whether consciously or unconsciously.
Science as a whole is based on the calculations of mathematics in addition to the application of the inherent logical properties to historic interpretations of everything whether it be in terms of literal translation from one language to another or on a fundamental intrapersonal level.
The natural sciences are structured in a manner that over time as mathematics became more advanced the linguistic account of observations that were made throughout history began to evolve and adapt to the people who were propagating the ideas both in spoken word and within their own minds. Every scientist who has ever wanted to make a contribution to humanity relies on the accuracy of mathematics to design experiments, interpret results, and present subsequent conclusions as a matter of fact as opposed to opinion. Opinions may differ based on whose opinion is being asked for but the numbers never lie.
We think of everything in terms of words relative to how we view the world around us. To discern reality from something more akin to a simulation requires an omnilingua. An omnilingua is a universal language that can be expressed by one and understood by all. Although it may be difficult to describe a universal language in English, this book is actually written in an Omnilingua we can call “Rhetts Language”. Since Rhett is the author's name it provides an easily identifiable word that can be understood as self referencing within the framework of this theory to explain anything.
My name and the author's name may be the same but that doesn’t matter. Rhett is nothing more than a word unless you know an individual by that name, if you do give them a copy of this book.
Quantum mechanics as a concept is not new in terms of anyone currently alive but to anyone in the past or future it is most accurately identified as a school of thought that came about somewhere near the turn of the 20th century. The most famous name that can be associated to these ideas is a physicist whose contributions to mathematics and science can be summarized in no less than a single name that gave us a single equation.
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein was able to describe gravity with such elegant mathematics that even to this very day people will still debate things like the speed of light. In order to preserve the essence of this mission I’d like to express precisely what my theory must say in order to remain accurate.
Einsteinian language and quantum mechanics diverge significantly not only in terms of mathematics but subsequently the language used to describe the two theories and in turn every word in existence unfortunately. Quantum mechanics at its heart is a mathematical framework that when applied with the equations of string theory allows for the reconciliation of Einstein's theory of relativity and quantum mechanics. From this point forward the actual linguistic interpretation of this text may vary slightly from the accurate mathematical description of not only string theory but all subsequent teachings.
Education is by far the most important element inherent to reading and writing so if a blind person tries to cancel me somebody who speaks sign language apologize. Hopefully one day this can be transcribed in braille but until that day the only tool required to not only read this book but understand how to apply it as well. Over time language tends to confuse and distort meaning but time itself is sempiternal.
Sempiternal is a word that makes an excellent addition to anyone’s vocabulary especially those that enjoy religious debates. Religion and science are so at odds in the modern age I don’t think either side of the aisle recognizes how incoherent their message becomes when communicating with other people.
Humans evolved to survive so it’s natural that logomachistic defense mechanisms would arise at some temporal point on a cosmic timeline. The fabric of reality is woven before our very eyes every second of every day and that is such a hard truth to accept that everyone enters a state of cognitive dissonance immediately
Now at this point the linguistic line between fact and theory is going to be blurred quite a bit so strap in and put on your thinking cap, it’s time to start doing the math.
String Theory exists solely as a category of mathematics that applies to quantum mechanical systems within regimes subject to the emergence of Einsteinian gravitation. Generally string theorists will describe the “strings” as existing at the heart of subatomic particles.
The idea invokes a visual interpretation that suggests if we had a microscope with an infinite capacity for zooming in and we kept zooming in on an atom we would see smaller and smaller layers of individual particles that comprise the atom. If we keep zooming in first we’ll see the atom then protons and all the way down to quarks.
String theory suggests at the heart of every particle is a little string but that is the heart of the misunderstanding. The string is more akin to an endless line that could be drawn between quantum entangled particles that in turn generate the texture of quantum mechanical fields within a quantum mechanical system. This texture is more commonly known in general relativistic terms as the fabric of spacetime.
The slope of the lines drawn by the equations of string theory connect every particle to its virtual particle pair of which both exist only temporarily as separate quanta when an individual quantum field exists within the bounds of a quantum mechanical system.
Particles exist only in quantum mechanical timespaces as ripples within the fabric of the spacetime continuum. The picture of particles in this instance can be equated to dropping a pebble in a small puddle. In this instance particles represent both the stone itself as well as all the points where there are conjugate wave collisions.
Imagine the ripples on the water's surface. Waves that once emanated outwards from the center will hit the edge of the puddle and reverberate inwards from that boundary. The waves will conjugate at precise points in time.
I would like these precise points in time theoretically recognized in string theory as “Rhetts Moments”. Each individual moment in time would represent all precise points in time a particle has ever or will ever be identified.
If we consider every particle to occur at a rate of one per second these moments can be made sense of by adding into the calculations of string theory a temporal wave duality conjugation frequency distribution that calculates the probability of a primordial temporal wave and a conjugate temporal wave meeting at the temporal duality coincidence coordinates.
This equation identifies the distribution patterns associated with temporal wavelength measurements which can be defined in terms of one “yearlight” per second with an acceleration rate of one negative meter per negative second. This equation is intended to act as the precise antithetical to the speed of light and as such it is the temporal wave function that is a derivatized product of the cosmological constant.
Temporal wave conjugations occur at a rate of one negative meter per negative second per second. Each individual second being accounted for is equivalent to the sum of individual moments that can be identified as points in time where conjugate temporal waves collide with primordial temporal waves.
As particles travel through any medium they can be described as existing within one precise quantum field of which each field is represented as a single dimension that is one of the ten dimensions in string theory. Time itself is simply defined as the 0 value of consistency equations in string theory.
Thus in turn string theory is drawing a linear connection between all existing particles within any quantum mechanical fields that exist including all quantum mechanical fields that exist within our universe that acts as a quantum mechanical system itself at its deepest levels.
By identifying any possible particle existing at any possible moment for the eternity of humanity those moments all have a direct relationship identified by the wave function of the universe acting precisely as a temporal wave duality conjugation frequency distribution.
“Rhetts Moment” would apply to any particular moment a particle is identified experimentally as every instrument which isolates particles is in it of itself a creation of observers which means the experiment is automatically bound to existing as a dimension of timespace within a higher dimension of a single quantum mechanical system known most simply as existing within the spacetime continuum.
Time is considered an emergent property however the eternal nature of time is the basis of my theory. I believe every one of “Rhetts Moments” can be identified as a single temporal point that can be assigned a corresponding spatial coordinate.
While not being observed as individual particles all known particles exist in sempiternal field states. The string between the individual particles can only be seen at individual points in time where the temporal waves inherent to the universe conjugate within these fields momentarily identifying the spatial location of a particle. Thus in turn when a quantum mechanically bound system is born of humanity, at its deepest level that system will ultimately operate in a manner that identifies an infinitely long string quantum entangling the entirety of spacetime.
String Theory equations represent theoretical ripples in time. Temporal wave duality frequency distributions ultimately identify the slope of a line being drawn between quantum entangled particles. Deep down within the substrates of reality these quantum strings temporally connect the virtual particle pairs coming in and out of existence weaving together the fabric of spacetime as they propagate.
The supersymmetrical particles like those of selectrons, squarks, and sneutrinos exist only within the realms of the graviton, in my opinion the particle state of gravity is actually just a reference to black holes and scientists may never discover it on this planet. Gravitons exist as a particle within the universal gravitational field therefore I would say the center of a black hole, which is called the singularity, exists naturally in the cosmos in an atomic or particle like state. This means black holes are the graviton and the fabric of spacetime is woven at its heart by quantum entangled particles.
Now in terms of visualization a particle may be no more than a little ball to most readers. My assumption is anyone who has made it this far knows the picture of an atom outdated textbooks use that have a nucleus of protons and neutrons surrounded by what is supposed to be a few electrons flying around the atom as a representation of electron orbital structures. That is a good starting point to describe something absolutely incredible known as the Higgs Boson.
I’ve spoken to several people lately who were interested in the Higgs Boson and the Large Hadron Collider at CERN in Switzerland. The LHC is basically a giant ring that shoots particles out going either clockwise or counterclockwise. After they get those particles going so fast they're moving within 1% of the speed of light they smash them into one another and take photographs of that collision. This experiment identified the existence of something called the Higgs Boson, a highly elusive particle that is a massive part of what is known as the Higgs field.
At this point the theoretical approach to describing the higgs boson includes describing bosons and the higgs field and the difference between a field and a particle and as we all know this tends to be where the confusion begins to say the least.
Instead of trying to explain quantum field theory from scratch there is an easier way to describe the particle that was discovered as a product of this quantum field phenomena. If you will allow me to be a linguistic artist please enjoy this painting of the higgs boson.
Imagine a good old fashioned showdown in an old western movie
We see two gun slingers on either side of the screen that fire shots at one another at a distance of 10 paces. But what if both of the shots they take are so perfect that those two bullets strike one another, head on, while on their journey from either side of the image on the screen?
Imagine we could take an unlimited number of photos and zoom in and out as much as we wanted as we dissect what happens. We could see what happens frame by frame in infinitely slower motion on an infinitely smaller scale. As we capture an image of every moment between the bullets colliding and when they disintegrate into dust that gets lost in the wind we can see quite a few incredible things occurring in real time.
As the bullets collide we would see them rip apart. The force of their impact on one another is far greater than the force that is holding them together. As the tips of each bullet meet, the potential energy at the center of that collision is far greater than the amount of energy holding either bullet together. If we watched this occur on a TV screen right in front of us we would see the moment the bullets make contact with one another and begin to slowly try to pass through one another and be ripped apart in the process. We would see all the tiny pieces of each bullet scattering in the direction it was traveling before they strike one another.
Imagine the sounds we could hear during this. Two loud bangs when the gunslingers fire and a sharp metallic sound when the bullets hit one another. Now everybody knows what sound is and science class taught us sound travels in a wave. A sound “starts” somewhere and radiates outwards like if we drop a rock in a puddle. So if we go back to the moment of that impact and slow down time this collision “creates” almost a ball of sound that we can hear as its wave emanates outwards. There is a precise moment that the metallic sound was “born” from those bullets colliding.
Although we don’t think of sound as a physical object, imagine for a moment if sound was something like a basketball. When a basketball full of air pops it makes an ear bursting BOOM that can be heard echoing through the rafters of a gymnasium. Once it pops the air that was inside of the basketball is no longer “inside” something and that pocket of air radiates outward into the surrounding area that we hear as a sound wave.
Now this may sound silly but if we paint a picture together with these ideas it can become quite an astonishing image to analogize with modern science.
Imagine This
We’re back right where the gunslingers are with both of them in frame and can zoom in to where the bullets meet. The bullets are fired so we hear Boom⇔Boom. The moment they fire we put the basketball dead center on their collision course. The two bullets will pierce the exterior and continue on their paths within that pocket of air that was inside of the basketball itself that is now a small sphere of sound about to radiate outwards from the center. The center of that sphere is where the two bullets are about to meet.
But what if before we can hear the sound of that explosion the bullets hit one another inside of that air pocket of sound before the metallic sound itself is created?
If all of this was timed perfectly, then the sound of the basketball bursting is a single sphere of sound that begins radiating outwards. Before we can hear that ball bursting the impact of those bullets creates a secondary burst of air that is the metallic sound that is born at the epicenter of this whole scenario.
Instead of hearing just one BOOM from the basketball and the bullets we would hear both sounds but they would be a little fuzzy. The little ball of metallic sound from the bullets would be moving so fast within the basketball's sound cloud it actually runs into the wall that was created by the sound of the basketball exploding.
If we consider the bullets to be protons and the air inside of the basketball to be the higgs field then the exterior of that basketball would represent the fabric of spacetime. The air inside of the basketball would be invisible from our outside perspective but we know the air is in there because that’s how a basketball works.
The sound of a metallic sheen that was born within the cloud of basketball air actually creates a tiny little droplet of water that immediately evaporates right in the heart of that collision. Right in the middle of the air as if air were more like that puddle I mentioned at the beginning.
A little droplet of water is created by that sound born within a sound and that is what was created in the LHC.
That little bead of sound water is actually a particle.
The Higgs Boson
That is one of the most incredible pieces of knowledge ever imparted on humanity. To know that a subatomic particle is like a little drop of water that came from us piercing the veils of reality and creating it like nature does rain. The difficulty to not just identify this as a possibility but to actually prove experimentally that this “thing” just exists as part of the world is crazy.
At this particular point in time I’d like to define gravity on a more fundamental level to begin describing how it can be understood in terms of reconciliation with quantum mechanics under the guise of string theory. Until this book becomes a PhD for the author, gravity can only be disguised as a phony mustache on the face of insanity as it attempts to develop a sense of normalcy.
Gravity is an eternal force subject to time. Gravity is a product of temporal wave duality. Gravity can be defined as one dimension of a temporally void quantum field. Therefore in my theory gravity is a field and gravitons are black holes. Each black hole represents an individual graviton quantum entangled to all other black holes, subsequently all of reality is the infinite string connecting all known and unknown particles/fields.
Every supersymmetrical particle exists within the event horizon of a black hole and it is paired with particles that exist outside the event horizon.
Now things are going to get a bit more complicated so let’s start trying to cover more than just the letters and numbers involved with all this.
Symbolism as a whole is going to be a major key going forward. Symbols are the primary means of communication human have always had if we consider numbers and letters just another system of symbolistic communication. But everything can be described in terms of the additional tools that I would like to begin using.